From: wangyanqing <udknight@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: Avoid NULL pointer dereference in usb_disconnect()
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:36:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711093651.GA10217@udknight> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1107111119080.4462@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:21:18AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> If, in drivers/usb/core/hub.c::usb_disconnect(), 'udev' is NULL, then
> we'll never get to the printing of a debug message and returning from
> the function since we'll have already dereferenced the NULL pointer in
> the bus_to_hcd(udev->bus) call.
> This patch moves the dereference to after the test for NULL, thus
> avoiding that potential crash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
> ---
> drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> disclaimer: compile tested only.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index a428aa0..0a98c76 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -1634,13 +1634,15 @@ void usb_disconnect(struct usb_device **pdev)
> {
> struct usb_device *udev = *pdev;
> int i;
> - struct usb_hcd *hcd = bus_to_hcd(udev->bus);
> + struct usb_hcd *hcd;
>
> if (!udev) {
> pr_debug ("%s nodev\n", __func__);
> return;
> }
>
> + hcd = bus_to_hcd(udev->bus);
> +
> /* mark the device as inactive, so any further urb submissions for
> * this device (and any of its children) will fail immediately.
> * this quiesces everything except pending urbs.
> --
> 1.7.6
>
>
> --
> Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hello,All.Just a question,should we add the NULL checker code at everywhere that
dereference pointer in kernel? If so,it will scare me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 9:21 Jesper Juhl
2011-07-11 9:36 ` wangyanqing [this message]
2011-07-11 9:47 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-07-11 15:01 ` Alan Stern
2011-07-11 20:59 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-07-12 0:50 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110711093651.GA10217@udknight \
--to=udknight@gmail.com \
--cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®