mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	jbeulich@novell.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:46:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711134636.79fea631@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309996623-23108-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>

On Wed,  6 Jul 2011 16:57:03 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove
> the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode
> revision from cpu_data instead
> 
> v2: Fix misplaced variable init. Remove unused variables.
> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com
> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
> Cc: khali@linux-fr.org
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c |   31 +++++--------------------------
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index 0070d54..2d038e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -307,15 +307,6 @@ static int get_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *dev)
>  	return adjust_tjmax(c, id, dev);
>  }
>  
> -static void __devinit get_ucode_rev_on_cpu(void *edx)
> -{
> -	u32 eax;
> -
> -	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
> -	sync_core();
> -	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, eax, *(u32 *)edx);
> -}
> -
>  static int get_pkg_tjmax(unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	int err;
> @@ -410,29 +401,17 @@ static void update_ttarget(__u8 cpu_model, struct temp_data *tdata,
>  static int __devinit chk_ucode_version(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(pdev->id);
> -	int err;
> -	u32 edx;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Check if we have problem with errata AE18 of Core processors:
>  	 * Readings might stop update when processor visited too deep sleep,
>  	 * fixed for stepping D0 (6EC).
>  	 */
> -	if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc) {
> -		/* check for microcode update */
> -		err = smp_call_function_single(pdev->id, get_ucode_rev_on_cpu,
> -					       &edx, 1);
> -		if (err) {
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> -				"Cannot determine microcode revision of "
> -				"CPU#%u (%d)!\n", pdev->id, err);
> -			return -ENODEV;
> -		} else if (edx < 0x39) {
> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> -				"Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
> -				"microcode of the CPU!\n");
> -			return -ENODEV;
> -		}
> +	if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc && c->microcode < 0x39) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> +			"Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
> +			"microcode of the CPU!\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }

Looks good, thanks.

Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>

-- 
Jean Delvare

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-11 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-06 23:57 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-07-11  8:19   ` Jean Delvare
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-07-11 11:46   ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2011-07-07 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-28 23:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v5 Andi Kleen
2011-09-28 23:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v4 Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-07-01 19:21 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 20:53   ` Jean Delvare
2011-05-26  2:08     ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-05-26  7:49       ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110711134636.79fea631@endymion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®