From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
jbeulich@novell.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:46:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110711134636.79fea631@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309996623-23108-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 16:57:03 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> Now that the ucode revision is available in cpu_data remove
> the existing code in coretemp.c to query it manually. Read the ucode
> revision from cpu_data instead
>
> v2: Fix misplaced variable init. Remove unused variables.
> Cc: jbeulich@novell.com
> Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com
> Cc: khali@linux-fr.org
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 31 +++++--------------------------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index 0070d54..2d038e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -307,15 +307,6 @@ static int get_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, struct device *dev)
> return adjust_tjmax(c, id, dev);
> }
>
> -static void __devinit get_ucode_rev_on_cpu(void *edx)
> -{
> - u32 eax;
> -
> - wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
> - sync_core();
> - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, eax, *(u32 *)edx);
> -}
> -
> static int get_pkg_tjmax(unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -410,29 +401,17 @@ static void update_ttarget(__u8 cpu_model, struct temp_data *tdata,
> static int __devinit chk_ucode_version(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(pdev->id);
> - int err;
> - u32 edx;
>
> /*
> * Check if we have problem with errata AE18 of Core processors:
> * Readings might stop update when processor visited too deep sleep,
> * fixed for stepping D0 (6EC).
> */
> - if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc) {
> - /* check for microcode update */
> - err = smp_call_function_single(pdev->id, get_ucode_rev_on_cpu,
> - &edx, 1);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "Cannot determine microcode revision of "
> - "CPU#%u (%d)!\n", pdev->id, err);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - } else if (edx < 0x39) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
> - "microcode of the CPU!\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> + if (c->x86_model == 0xe && c->x86_mask < 0xc && c->microcode < 0x39) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Errata AE18 not fixed, update BIOS or "
> + "microcode of the CPU!\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
> return 0;
> }
Looks good, thanks.
Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-06 23:57 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, intel: Use cpu_update for Atom errata check Andi Kleen
2011-07-11 8:19 ` Jean Delvare
2011-07-06 23:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-07-11 11:46 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2011-07-07 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-28 23:19 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v5 Andi Kleen
2011-09-28 23:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v4 Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 23:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-07-01 19:21 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v3 Andi Kleen
2011-07-01 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 [PATCH 1/3] x86, intel: Output microcode revision v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] coretemp: Get microcode revision from cpu_data v2 Andi Kleen
2011-05-25 20:53 ` Jean Delvare
2011-05-26 2:08 ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-05-26 7:49 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110711134636.79fea631@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®