From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753094Ab1GOP1q (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:27:46 -0400 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:37230 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752382Ab1GOP1p (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:27:45 -0400 Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:27:38 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mel Gorman Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , Linux-Netdev , LKML , David Miller , Neil Brown , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Swap-over-NBD without deadlocking v5 Message-ID: <20110715152738.GA2276@infradead.org> References: <1308575540-25219-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20110706165146.be7ab61b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110707094737.GG15285@suse.de> <20110707125831.GA15412@infradead.org> <20110715141021.GZ7529@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110715141021.GZ7529@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:10:21PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > Any objection to the swap-over-NBD stuff going ahead to get part of the > complexity out of the way? Sure, that's what I was advocating for. The filesystem interfaces in the current swap over nbd patches on the other hand are complete crap and need to be redone, but we've already discussed that a lot of times.