From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] perf, ftrace: Add new perf ioctl for function trace filter
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:57:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110719095727.GA3008@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110718151229.GA32167@somewhere>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 05:12:33PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 03:22:55PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > As the amount of kernel functions obtained by the ftrace:function tracepoint
> > is quite big, it's desirable to be able to set the filter on the ftrace
> > level.
> >
> > Added PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FTRACE ioctl to be able to specify function filter
> > for perf event. The interface is the same as for the set_ftrace_filter file.
> >
> > Also the same string parser is used as for the set_ftrace_filter file.
>
> I'm not sure I understand why an ioctl is needed for that.
> Why not using the ftrace filter?
>
> The first idea was to do something like this:
>
> ip == func1 || ip == func2 || ....
The part where I got stuck is when you start to combine the fields
in the filter like:
ip == func1 || ip_parent != func2
ip == func1 || (ip == func2 && ip_parent != func3)
Which is ok when all functions are enabled and ip/parent_ip fields
are treated as values. But I'd need enable proper set of functions
based on above filter parsing.. which might not be that easy :)
So I thought it'd be easier to have the filter as above,
plus you could specify the amount of traced functions with
ioctl command.
>
> But that makes a too long expression. So I thought we
> could bring support for the "+" operator and have expressions
> like:
>
> ip == func1 + func2 + func3 + ....
>
> ip == !func1
So would you like to have just simple filter for function event?
(embedded into the current event filter..) like:
ip == func1 + func2 + func3 +
Support just one 'ip' field and whatever we got in the parameter
we put into the ftrace filter.. ?
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-19 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 13:22 [RFC 0/4] trace,perf: Enabling ftrace:function tracepoint for perf Jiri Olsa
2011-07-11 13:22 ` [RFC 1/4] perf, ftrace: Add perf support to use function tracepoint Jiri Olsa
2011-07-11 13:22 ` [RFC 2/4] perf, ftrace: Add filter support for ftrace:function tracepoint Jiri Olsa
2011-08-10 19:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-11 13:22 ` [RFC 3/4] perf, ftrace: Add new perf ioctl for function trace filter Jiri Olsa
2011-07-18 15:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-19 9:57 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2011-07-26 13:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-27 12:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-08-10 20:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-11 13:22 ` [RFC 4/4] perf, ftrace: Add ftrace option for perf stat command Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110719095727.GA3008@jolsa.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®