From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751988Ab1GSX3B (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:29:01 -0400 Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.55.9]:37000 "HELO oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751351Ab1GSX3A (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:29:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=xenotime.net; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Organization:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=cTeKAuP9MpFqIE01Kvw1/glZBuKQzX5ow7NYMOh08971qMp0W1jSkSCfKIYNNVOEWb2hx44MviugRATLKvndrS/oBCsmhOUqZDKw05d7yxQMwVSnxM7FCMtZL9dddV9Z; Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:28:57 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Hugh Dickins Cc: akpm , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] radix_tree: exceptional entries and indices Message-Id: <20110719162857.63b6b0be.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20110617163854.49225203.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110617170742.282a1bd6.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110617171228.4c85fd38.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > > And one Andrew Morton has a userspace radix tree test harness at > > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/rtth.tar.gz > > > > This should still be as relevant as it was before, but I notice its > > radix_tree.c is almost identical to the source currently in the kernel > > tree, so I ought at the least to keep it in synch. > > I was hoping to have dealt with this by now, Randy; but after downloading > an up-to-date urcu, I'm finding what's currently in rtth does not build > with it. Unlikely to be hard to fix, but means I'll have to defer it a > little while longer. Sure, not a problem. Thanks for not dropping it completely. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***