From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752770Ab1GUITb (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:19:31 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:46813 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752503Ab1GUIT1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:19:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:19:21 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Note on Linux 3.0 and the 3.1 merge window Message-ID: <20110721081921.GA2986@liondog.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 06:38:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > - Please do spend the time doing some last-minute checking of the > current git tree. The 3.0 release hasn't really had a lot of > fundamental changes, and the pathname bug Hugh found wasn't even a > regression - it's been there a while and was in no way a 3.0 thing. So > I don't really expect any huge issues, but just for psychological > reasons it would be nice to not have even a whiff of the traditional > ".0 problems" . Just built and booted 3.0.0-rc7-00176-gcf6ace1 here - it feels pretty solid, not even a squeak in dmesg or some other hint of problems. I'll keep watching it... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris.