mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: jaxboe@fusionio.com
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: strict rq_affinity
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:59:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110722205938.17420.68621.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722205736.17420.41366.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6>

Some storage controllers benefit from completions always being steered
to the strict requester cpu rather than the looser "per-socket" steering
that blk_cpu_to_group() attempts by default.

echo 2 > /sys/block/<bdev>/queue/rq_affinity

Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Tested-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt |   10 +++++++---
 block/blk-core.c                    |    6 ++----
 block/blk-softirq.c                 |   11 +++++++----
 block/blk-sysfs.c                   |   13 +++++++++----
 include/linux/blkdev.h              |    3 ++-
 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt
index f652740..d8147b3 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt
+++ b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt
@@ -45,9 +45,13 @@ device.
 
 rq_affinity (RW)
 ----------------
-If this option is enabled, the block layer will migrate request completions
-to the CPU that originally submitted the request. For some workloads
-this provides a significant reduction in CPU cycles due to caching effects.
+If this option is '1', the block layer will migrate request completions to the
+cpu "group" that originally submitted the request. For some workloads this
+provides a significant reduction in CPU cycles due to caching effects.
+
+For storage configurations that need to maximize distribution of completion
+processing setting this option to '2' forces the completion to run on the
+requesting cpu (bypassing the "group" aggregation logic).
 
 scheduler (RW)
 --------------
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index d2f8f40..9c7ba87 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1279,10 +1279,8 @@ get_rq:
 	init_request_from_bio(req, bio);
 
 	if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags) ||
-	    bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CPU_AFFINE)) {
-		req->cpu = blk_cpu_to_group(get_cpu());
-		put_cpu();
-	}
+	    bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CPU_AFFINE))
+		req->cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	plug = current->plug;
 	if (plug) {
diff --git a/block/blk-softirq.c b/block/blk-softirq.c
index ee9c216..475fab8 100644
--- a/block/blk-softirq.c
+++ b/block/blk-softirq.c
@@ -103,22 +103,25 @@ static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata blk_cpu_notifier = {
 
 void __blk_complete_request(struct request *req)
 {
+	int ccpu, cpu, group_cpu = NR_CPUS;
 	struct request_queue *q = req->q;
 	unsigned long flags;
-	int ccpu, cpu, group_cpu;
 
 	BUG_ON(!q->softirq_done_fn);
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	group_cpu = blk_cpu_to_group(cpu);
 
 	/*
 	 * Select completion CPU
 	 */
-	if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags) && req->cpu != -1)
+	if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags) && req->cpu != -1) {
 		ccpu = req->cpu;
-	else
+		if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE, &q->queue_flags)) {
+			ccpu = blk_cpu_to_group(ccpu);
+			group_cpu = blk_cpu_to_group(cpu);
+		}
+	} else
 		ccpu = cpu;
 
 	if (ccpu == cpu || ccpu == group_cpu) {
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
index d935bd8..0ee17b5 100644
--- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
@@ -244,8 +244,9 @@ static ssize_t queue_nomerges_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page,
 static ssize_t queue_rq_affinity_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page)
 {
 	bool set = test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags);
+	bool force = test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE, &q->queue_flags);
 
-	return queue_var_show(set, page);
+	return queue_var_show(set << force, page);
 }
 
 static ssize_t
@@ -257,10 +258,14 @@ queue_rq_affinity_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count)
 
 	ret = queue_var_store(&val, page, count);
 	spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
-	if (val)
+	if (val) {
 		queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, q);
-	else
-		queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP,  q);
+		if (val == 2)
+			queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE, q);
+	} else {
+		queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, q);
+		queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE, q);
+	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
 #endif
 	return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 1a23722..b228825 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ struct request_queue
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH	6	/* don't use elevator, just do FIFO */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_BIDI		7	/* queue supports bidi requests */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES     8	/* disable merge attempts */
-#define QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP	9	/* force complete on same CPU */
+#define QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP	9	/* complete on same CPU-group */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_FAIL_IO     10	/* fake timeout */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_STACKABLE   11	/* supports request stacking */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT      12	/* non-rotational device (SSD) */
@@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ struct request_queue
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_NOXMERGES   15	/* No extended merges */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM  16	/* Contributes to random pool */
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_SECDISCARD  17	/* supports SECDISCARD */
+#define QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE  18	/* force complete on same CPU */
 
 #define QUEUE_FLAG_DEFAULT	((1 << QUEUE_FLAG_IO_STAT) |		\
 				 (1 << QUEUE_FLAG_STACKABLE)	|	\


  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-22 20:59 [RFC PATCH 0/2] block: rq_affinity performance fixes Dan Williams
2011-07-22 20:59 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2011-07-23  1:46   ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: strict rq_affinity Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-23 18:38     ` Jens Axboe
2011-07-23 18:41   ` Jens Axboe
2011-07-25  1:14     ` Shaohua Li
2011-07-25  8:21       ` Jens Axboe
2011-07-22 20:59 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] block: adaptive rq_affinity Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110722205938.17420.68621.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6 \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®