From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] uvcvideo: Add FIX_BANDWIDTH quirk to HP Webcam found on HP Mini 5103 netbook
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:12:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107230112.12868.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722222520.GA14917@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>
Hi Kirill,
On Saturday 23 July 2011 00:25:20 Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:03:57AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 22 July 2011 16:47:22 Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > > [ Cc'ing Andrew Morton -- Andrew, could you please pick this patch, in
> > >
> > > case there is no response from maintainers again? Thanks beforehand.
> > > ]
> > >
> > > Hello up there,
> > >
> > > My first posting was 1 month ago, and a reminder ~ 2 weeks ago. All
> > > without a reply. v3.0 is out and they say the merge window will be
> > > shorter this time, so in oder not to miss it, I've decided to resend my
> > > patch on lowering USB periodic bandwidth allocation topic.
> >
> > I'm very very sorry for missing the patch (and worse, twice :-/).
>
> Nevermind. I'm curious though, whether I did something wrong or anything
> else? I mean how to avoid such long delays next time?
It was all my fault, mails piled up in my mailbox and for some reason I marked
yours as processed while they were not. I certainly hope it won't happen
again.
> > > Could this simple patch be please applied?
> >
> > Yes it can. I see that Andrew already applied it to his tree. Mauro,
> > should it go through there, or through your tree ? I've pushed it to my
> > tree at git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git uvcvideo-stable, so you
> > can already pull.
>
> You've applied the patch from my first posting, but actually in the
> RESEND one I've added reference to EHCI-tweaking patch -- it is already
> merged into Greg's USB tree (it was not when I first posted), so could you
> please reapply? (sorry for confusion).
Sure. That should now be fixed.
> Thanks for replying and for uvcvideo,
You're more than welcome. Thank you for the patch, and thank you for keeping
on pushing :-)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-22 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 14:47 Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 22:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-07-22 22:25 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 23:12 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2011-07-23 18:15 ` Kirill Smelkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201107230112.12868.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirr@mns.spb.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®