mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] uvcvideo: Add FIX_BANDWIDTH quirk to HP Webcam found on HP Mini 5103 netbook
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:12:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107230112.12868.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110722222520.GA14917@tugrik.mns.mnsspb.ru>

Hi Kirill,

On Saturday 23 July 2011 00:25:20 Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:03:57AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 22 July 2011 16:47:22 Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > >  [ Cc'ing Andrew Morton -- Andrew, could you please pick this patch, in
> > >  
> > >    case there is no response from maintainers again? Thanks beforehand.
> > >    ]
> > > 
> > > Hello up there,
> > > 
> > > My first posting was 1 month ago, and a reminder ~ 2 weeks ago. All
> > > without a reply. v3.0 is out and they say the merge window will be
> > > shorter this time, so in oder not to miss it, I've decided to resend my
> > > patch on lowering USB periodic bandwidth allocation topic.
> > 
> > I'm very very sorry for missing the patch (and worse, twice :-/).
> 
> Nevermind. I'm curious though, whether I did something wrong or anything
> else?  I mean how to avoid such long delays next time?

It was all my fault, mails piled up in my mailbox and for some reason I marked 
yours as processed while they were not. I certainly hope it won't happen 
again.

> > > Could this simple patch be please applied?
> > 
> > Yes it can. I see that Andrew already applied it to his tree. Mauro,
> > should it go through there, or through your tree ? I've pushed it to my
> > tree at git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/uvcvideo.git uvcvideo-stable, so you
> > can already pull.
> 
> You've applied the patch from my first posting, but actually in the
> RESEND one I've added reference to EHCI-tweaking patch -- it is already
> merged into Greg's USB tree (it was not when I first posted), so could you
> please reapply? (sorry for confusion).

Sure. That should now be fixed.

> Thanks for replying and for uvcvideo,

You're more than welcome. Thank you for the patch, and thank you for keeping 
on pushing :-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-22 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-22 14:47 Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 22:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2011-07-22 22:25   ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 23:12     ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2011-07-23 18:15       ` Kirill Smelkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201107230112.12868.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kirr@mns.spb.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-uvc-devel@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®