From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754495Ab1G0PmH (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:42:07 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:26610 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752784Ab1G0PmF (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:42:05 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,276,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="30746658" Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:42:03 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Boris Ostrovsky Cc: Andi Kleen , "ostr@amd64.org" , "jvpeetz@web.de" , "Petkov, Borislav" , "mingo@elte.hu" , "gregkh@suse.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@kernel.org" , "tim.bird@am.sony.com" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [25/98] x86, AMD: Fix APIC timer erratum 400 affecting K8 Rev.A-E processors Message-ID: <20110727154203.GB16180@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20110726534.972201586@firstfloor.org> <20110727003517.6946C2403FF@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <4E3006DF.6010906@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E3006DF.6010906@amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Andi, this patch is unnecessary. > > It (as well as 328935e6348c6a7cb34798a68c326f4b8372e68a and > 14fb57dccb6e1defe9f89a66f548fcb24c374c1d) is superseded by > e9cdd343a5e42c43bcda01e609fa23089e026470 upstream Is it obsolete in 2.6.35 too? So what should I do? Drop this one and merge some other? Or just drop? If yes why do the other ones not have Cc: stable marks? Thanks, -Andi