mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Cc: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com,
	per.friden@stericsson.com, wei.zhang@freescale.com,
	ebony.zhu@freescale.com, iws@ovro.caltech.edu,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, maciej.sosnowski@intel.com,
	saeed@marvell.com, shawn.guo@freescale.com, yur@emcraft.com,
	agust@denx.de, iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com,
	per.forlin@stericsson.com, jonas.aberg@stericsson.com,
	anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] DMAEngine: Let dmac drivers to set chan_id
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:37:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110727203710.GB5028@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJe_Zhd+Z4-=xDzFrd3ARuKZkUAo6n_miQgdSADY9Uk6uhkqhw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 08:00:23PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> On 27 July 2011 14:32, Koul, Vinod <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> > You can have two different DMACs in same system. At least I have two
> > from current intel_mid_dma which are used. Both give their channel id
> > starting from 0, 1....
> > Further as we integrate video, audio, spi, emmc dmacs possibility of
> > having multiple dmacs will increase in a system
>
> Most of Samsung's S5P series have 3 DMACs - 2 for peripherals and 1 for
> mem->mem But that is not the point.
> 
> This patch in no way affects what values currently a dmac driver
> assigns to chan_id

Then *explain* how the chan_id is used to match the channel which the
peripheral requires when you have three DMA controllers, each with
channels numbered 0 to 7.

> > Sorry I didn't get you.
> > As I understand you are trying to simplify the filter function by
> > assigning unique ids to all channels,
>
> No dear. Let me put it precisely.
> 
> Even if we make no further change to the dmaengine, this patch is the right
> thing to do today.

You sound like a politician.  "the right thing to do" is a cop-out.  That
says "believe me, I know I'm right, but I can't say why I'm right, I just
am."  Basically, it means that the person saying it has no clue on the
subject they're talking about.

If you do have a clue, then don't say that infuriating phrase, but give an
actual reason.

> On a serious note, my proposal, and the reply, shows the possibility
> of having :-
> a) Client drivers that are truly platform agnostic -- no platform_data
> poking for
>       channel selection

I really doubt that's even possible.  Take this setup:

MMCI ---> DMAC

where the DMAC has 32 request signals, and 8 channels.  The MMCI is
connected to two of them.  The DMAC can supply any of its physical
channels for MMCI.

Board 1 has the MMCI connected to request signals #1 and #3.  Board 2
has the MMCI connected to request signals #8 and #22.  Board 3 has
the MMCI connected through an external FPGA mux, which can route the
MMCI requests to DMA request signals #1, #2 or #3.

Now, explain how a channel is selected for each of those two boards, and
the DMA controller is provided with the relevant request signal is found
without platform data involved, using _only_ your 'capabilities' bitfield
and the channel ID number.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-27 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-20 18:18 [PATCH] DMAEngine: Let dmac drivers " Jassi Brar
2011-07-21  4:01 ` [PATCHv2] DMAEngine: Let dmac drivers to " Jassi Brar
2011-07-22 15:27   ` Linus Walleij
2011-07-22 17:43     ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-22 22:23       ` Williams, Dan J
2011-07-23  3:56         ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-25 18:55           ` Williams, Dan J
2011-07-25 19:17             ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-25 20:08               ` Williams, Dan J
2011-07-26 14:30                 ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-26 15:29                   ` Williams, Dan J
2011-07-26 18:12                     ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-27  4:21                       ` Koul, Vinod
2011-07-27  7:17                         ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-27  9:02                           ` Koul, Vinod
2011-07-27  9:59                             ` Mika Westerberg
2011-07-27  9:34                               ` Koul, Vinod
2011-07-27 10:36                                 ` Mika Westerberg
2011-07-27 14:50                               ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-27 16:36                                 ` Williams, Dan J
2011-07-27 17:14                                   ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-27 20:28                                     ` Russell King
2011-07-28 10:44                                       ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-28 22:27                                         ` Linus Walleij
2011-07-28 22:43                                           ` Russell King
2011-07-29 12:20                                             ` Linus Walleij
2011-07-29 11:54                                           ` Koul, Vinod
2011-07-28 22:35                                         ` Russell King
2011-07-29 14:11                                           ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-27 14:30                             ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-27 20:37                               ` Russell King [this message]
2011-07-28 10:56                                 ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-28 13:44                                   ` Russell King
2011-07-28 17:54                                 ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-28 18:14                                   ` Williams, Dan J
2011-07-28 18:25                                     ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-28 22:40                                   ` Russell King
2011-07-30 13:09                                     ` Jaswinder Singh
2011-07-30 14:22                                       ` Russell King
2011-07-30 15:00                                         ` Jaswinder Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110727203710.GB5028@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=agust@denx.de \
    --cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ebony.zhu@freescale.com \
    --cc=iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com \
    --cc=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
    --cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=jonas.aberg@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.sosnowski@intel.com \
    --cc=per.forlin@stericsson.com \
    --cc=per.friden@stericsson.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=saeed@marvell.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=wei.zhang@freescale.com \
    --cc=yur@emcraft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®