From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756047Ab1G1P46 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:56:58 -0400 Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([66.147.249.253]:56581 "HELO oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755549Ab1G1PzL (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:55:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:55:08 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: James Bottomley Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] First round of SCSI updates for 2.6.39 merge window Message-Id: <20110728085508.e8e00efe.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <1311842979.30253.29.camel@mulgrave> References: <1311441452.23720.17.camel@mulgrave> <20110723102719.a7f26008.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1311842979.30253.29.camel@mulgrave> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 12:49:39 +0400 James Bottomley wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 10:27 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:17:32 +0400 James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > This represents the usual round of driver updates (fcoe, bfa, mpt2sas, > > > iscsi, bnx2fc) plus a couple of fixes that didn't make 3.0 including the > > > USB force eject oops. > > > > > > The patch is available here: > > > > > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git > > > > Hi James, > > > > (please fix $subject) > > Hmm, reusability gone too far > > > What has happened to these 2 patches from 2011-June-21 ? > > > > Subject: [PATCH] scsi: fix NCR_Q720 section mismatch warning > > Subject: [PATCH] scsi: fix sim710 section mismatch warnings > > Ralf is reworking them. Basically there's no point mucking with > creating work via the endless sectional annotators in obsolete drivers, > so he was just going to strip the annotations where they cause problems. Thanks for the info. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***