From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754810Ab1G2AhI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:37:08 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:39368 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754640Ab1G2AhG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:37:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:37:03 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: matsumur@nts.ricoh.co.jp Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, ak@linux.intel.com, cjb@laptop.org, daniel.manrique@canonical.com, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, manoj.iyer@canonical.com, stable@kernel.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [9/50] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock Message-ID: <20110729003703.GM8006@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20110728234413.75CBB2403FF@tassilo.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:27:56AM +0900, matsumur@nts.ricoh.co.jp wrote: > Dear Sir, > > Ricoh 1180:e823 device is named R5U220/R5U232 (2 devices have the same > device ID ). > So, I think it should be declared to as PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5U220. Is that just the wrong name or will it actually cause misfunction? I will keep it if it's just the wrong name, but the name should be probably fixed upstream. -Andi