From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753203Ab1HAKOg (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:14:36 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:59980 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752083Ab1HAKOa (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 06:14:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:14:10 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Zoltan Devai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chris@zankel.net, linux-am33-list@redhat.com, trivial@kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cmetcalf@tilera.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove remaining references of CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME Message-ID: <20110801101410.GE15578@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1312042478-26012-1-git-send-email-zdevai@gmail.com> <20110801083614.GC15578@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:09:02PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:36, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Zoltan Devai wrote: > >> Commit 592913ecb87a9e06f98ddb55b298f1a66bf94c6b has killed off any > >> use of this config option long ago. > > > > I don't see the point of this - we were free of GENERIC_TIME on ARM > > shortly after it was originally killed off.  The problem is you can't > > stop people introducing new uses of this - because it existed once and > > there's nothing which errors out on its presence, people are going to > > continue submitting patches with it in.  And it's going to continue > > being missed at the review stage. > > > > I've a similar problem with folk on ARM including mach/gpio.h as their > > sole gpio header file rather than linux/gpio.h - I've been trying for > > the last 1-2 years to educate people to use linux/ in preference.  You > > can't do it, and I'm still just about the only one who picks up on that. > > (SoC maintainers don't care.)  They will end up caring when I push a > > change during the next merge window though, so I'll eventually stop > > mach/gpio.h being included.  (Instead, it'll be asm/gpio.h). > > > > GENERIC_TIME though... I don't think you'll ever stop new uses of it > > creeping in unless you can arrange for something to error out. > > Doesn't kconf error out when trying to select a non-existent symbol? Nope.