From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755340Ab1HBVLd (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:11:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:43634 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755280Ab1HBVL0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:11:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:09:22 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Thomas Meyer Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use kstrdup rather than duplicating its implementation Message-ID: <20110802210922.GC3839@shale.localdomain> References: <1312302089.2629.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110802180537.GB3839@shale.localdomain> <1312313657.2629.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1312313657.2629.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 09:34:14PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote: > Does somebody maybe have a script for doing this split of an mbox file? > maybe this script could also call get_maintainer.pl and change the To: > field accordingly? > > Just asking... Checking it by hand builds character. :) Reviewers have to check each patch by hand for mistakes and malice so this serves as a small test to see if it's worth bothering maintainers about it. regards, dan carpenter