From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751762Ab1HCEGU (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:06:20 -0400 Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.129]:37725 "EHLO ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278Ab1HCEGQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 00:06:16 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlkDAILGOE55LCkBgWdsb2JhbABCp1oVAQEWJiWBQAEBBTocIxAIAxguFCUDIRPGbw6GNASjcQ Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:06:13 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Gui Jianfeng Cc: Vivek Goyal , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fio posixaio performance problem Message-ID: <20110803040613.GJ12870@dastard> References: <4E38C314.8070305@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E38C314.8070305@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 11:40:04AM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote: > Hi, > > I ran a fio test to simulate qemu-kvm io behaviour. > When job number is greater than 2, IO performance is > really bad. > > 1 thread: aggrb=15,129KB/s > 4 thread: aggrb=1,049KB/s > > Kernel: lastest upstream > > Any idea? > > --- > [global] > runtime=30 > time_based=1 > size=1G > group_reporting=1 > ioengine=posixaio > exec_prerun='echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches' > thread=1 > > [kvmio-1] > description=kvmio-1 > numjobs=4 > rw=write > bs=4k > direct=1 > filename=/mnt/sda4/1G.img What filesystem? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com