From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754196Ab1HIRKp (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:10:45 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:9636 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753893Ab1HIRKn (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 13:10:43 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,344,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="36830408" Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:10:41 -0700 From: Sarah Sharp To: Hans de Goede Cc: Greg KH , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libusb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Alexander Graf , Gerd Hoffmann , hector@marcansoft.com, Jan Kiszka , Stefan Hajnoczi , pbonzini@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori , Jes Sorensen , Alan Stern , Oliver Neukum , Felipe Balbi , Clemens Ladisch , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Laurent Pinchart , Theodore Kilgore , Adam Baker Subject: Re: USB mini-summit at LinuxCon Vancouver Message-ID: <20110809171041.GA5634@xanatos> References: <20110610002103.GA7169@xanatos> <4E3B1B7B.2040501@infradead.org> <20110804225603.GA2557@kroah.com> <4E3B9FB4.30709@redhat.com> <20110808175837.GA6398@xanatos> <4E40E74C.9060902@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E40E74C.9060902@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:52:44AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/08/2011 07:58 PM, Sarah Sharp wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 09:45:56AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>On 08/05/2011 12:56 AM, Greg KH wrote: > >>>On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 07:21:47PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>I think it is important to separate oranges from apples here, there are > >>at least 3 different problem classes which all seem to have gotten thrown > >>onto a pile here: > >> > >>1) The reason Mauro suggested having some discussion on this at the > >>USB summit is because of a discussion about dual mode cameras on the > >>linux media list. > >... > >>3) Re-direction of usb devices to virtual machines. This works by using > >>the userspace usbfs interface from qemu / vmware / virtualbox / whatever. > >>The basics of this work fine, but it lacks proper locking / safeguards > >>for when a vm takes over a usb device from the in kernel driver. > > > >Hi Hans and Mauro, > > > >We have do room in the schedule for the USB mini-summit for this > >discussion, since the schedule is still pretty flexible. The > >preliminary schedule is up here: > > > >http://userweb.kernel.org/~sarah/linuxcon-usb-minisummit.html > > > >I think it's best to discuss the VM redirection in the afternoon when > >some of the KVM folks join us after Hans' talk on USB redirection over > >the network. > > > > That seems best to me too. I'm available at both proposed time slots, > and I would like to join both discussions. > > >It sounds like we need a separate topic for the dual mode cameras and TV > >tuners. Mauro, do you want to lead that discussion in the early morning > >(in a 9:30 to 10:30 slot) or in the late afternoon (in a 15:30 to 16:30 > >slot)? I want to be sure we have all the video/media developers who are > >interested in this topic present, and I don't know if they will be going > >to the KVM forum. > > I would really like to see the dual mode camera and TV tuner discussion > separated. They are 2 different issues AFAIK. Ok, great, I've put both topics in the morning, in separate slots. Sarah Sharp