From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751712Ab1HODXZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:23:25 -0400 Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.22.20]:53343 "HELO oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751371Ab1HODXY (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:23:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:23:22 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Mike Waychison , Greg KH , lkml , Andrew Morton , Theodore Tso , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag Message-Id: <20110814202322.16b50ff5.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <2d50505d-3500-47d8-84d4-b32850bdec7e@email.android.com> References: <20110729180028.6a2091b3.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20110730235644.GA29671@suse.de> <4E359A74.7090408@zytor.com> <20110813123401.76ffcfcc.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <2d50505d-3500-47d8-84d4-b32850bdec7e@email.android.com> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 17:29:52 -0400 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > >On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:09:56 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > >> On 07/31/2011 11:07 AM, Mike Waychison wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Internal-reference-ID: rdunlap.2011.0729.id1 > >> >>> > >> > > >> > Acked-by: Mike Waychison > >> > > >> > >> Just to avoid namespace collisions, can we at least put the owner > >> somewhere standardized, e.g. <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap>, <33999@google> > >and > >> so on? > > > >I would prefer to leave the text contents as unspecified, but I > >wouldn't > >mind recommending that users try to make them unique, e.g., by using > >a company-ID or owner-ID. Would that be acceptable? > > > > > >--- > >~Randy > >*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your > >code *** > > No, that wouldn't work when there is more than one tag from different users. And yes, I fully expect to see that. > -- I guess that's a NAK or at least not consensus. Would you like to submit an alternative? --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***