From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753234Ab1HOV1L (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:27:11 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:51971 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752601Ab1HOV1K (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:27:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 23:26:59 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Peter =?iso-8859-15?Q?H=FCwe?= Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Nicolas Ferre , Paul Mundt , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] video/atmel_lcdfb: Fix build failure/typo for avr32 defconfig Message-ID: <20110815212659.GA18198@pengutronix.de> References: <1313429190-29275-1-git-send-email-peterhuewe@gmx.de> <201108151931.27607.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> <201108151943.08347.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201108151943.08347.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: wsa@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 07:43:07PM +0200, Peter H=FCwe wrote: > Am Montag 15 August 2011, 19:31:27 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > > Thanks for the patch. I've already submitted the same patch > > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/990792/) nearly a month ago to the > > linux- fbdev mailing list. Paul, can you please pick it up ? >=20 > Ah okay, didn't see it. I usually look on the lkml if the problem was alr= eady=20 > fixed lately but somehow missed your patch. >=20 > Since you've done exactly what my patch did you get my=20 > Reviewed-by: Peter Huewe This bug was spotted during the review phase, too: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/878382/ Dunno if the wrong patch was picked up or the follow up patch never came ar= ound. Doesn't matter: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5JjyMACgkQD27XaX1/VRvG2ACeMJPv7Le8EpjUYxqDtAEJSh6G N+sAoIi5n0uGTWQTQVTKdfb3f/tN5dn+ =3LSh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--