From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86_32_early_logical_apicid() -> one warning per CPU on late-determined BIGSMP systems
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:59:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110818115921.GA20085@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4D19820200007800051D19@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:54:10PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.08.11 at 12:15, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Ooh, okay, bigsmp switches apic pretty late in the init. Wouldn't it
> > be better to move that to right after dmi init regardless of this
> > problem?
>
> No, because this depends on knowing num_possible_cpus(), which
> in turn can't be done until after the firmware tables got parsed (and
> that's where the ->x86_32_early_logical_apicid() call happens).
OIC, switching apic that late seems rather nasty. Eh well... :(
> > So, yeah, please go ahead and remove it.
>
> There are quite a few references to this, and some from code that
> if I change it I would have no way of testing (Summit, ES7000, NUMAQ).
> So no, I don't think I'm in the position to do this cleanup (if it really is
> just that).
>
> So for the time being I'll put together a patch re-writing
> early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid, ...) right after overriding
> apic_default with apic_bigsmp.
Yeap, sure. We'll need less invasive for -stable anyway. I'll kill
the method afterwards.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 12:49 Jan Beulich
2011-08-12 10:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-18 11:54 ` Jan Beulich
2011-08-18 11:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110818115921.GA20085@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®