From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754921Ab1HRTMK (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:12:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34419 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754965Ab1HRTME (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:12:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:11:16 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap_init Message-ID: <20110818191115.GP2227@zod.bos.redhat.com> References: <20110810124528.GC2566@zod.bos.redhat.com> <20110814230453.GP2650@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110815140416.GB2227@zod.bos.redhat.com> <20110815152052.GA2389@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110817223735.GI2227@zod.bos.redhat.com> <20110817224916.GO2419@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110817230219.GJ2227@zod.bos.redhat.com> <20110817230641.GA7837@somewhere.redhat.com> <20110817231750.GK2227@zod.bos.redhat.com> <20110818183523.GD2325@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110818183523.GD2325@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:35:23AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:17:50PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:06:44AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:02:19PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 03:49:16PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:37:35PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:20:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > > > > Please see the attached. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixed it up quickly to apply on top of -rc2 and it seems to solve the > > > > > > > > problem nicely. Thanks for the patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good to hear! I guess I should keep it, then. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Paul, were you going to send this to Linus for -rc3? I haven't seen > > > > > > it come across LKML yet. > > > > > > > > > > I might... But does it qualify as a regression? That part of the > > > > > code hasn't changed for some time now. > > > > > > > > It's a fix for a problem that is newly surfaced in 3.1. A regression, > > > > likely not since it's been there forever, but new debugging options > > > > uncovered it. I'm pretty sure the -rc stage takes fixes even if they > > > > aren't regressions. > > > > > > Nope, after -rc1 only regressions fixes are taken (most of the time). > > > > Sigh. > > > > Look, either way I'm carrying this patch in Fedora because it fixes > > a bug that is actually being reported by users (and by abrtd as well). > > If you both want to wait until 3.2 to actually submit it to Linus, > > then OK. > > > > Honestly, I'm just glad we actually run with the debug options enabled > > (which seems to be a rare thing) so bugs like this are actually found. > > Thanks for the fix. > > I am sorry, but I didn't make the rules! And I must carry the fix > longer as well, if that makes you feel any better. My thank you was meant to be sincere, not snarky. It's a two-line addition to a spec file, so it's not as if the burden is unbearable. Especially when doing it prevents me from duping a large number of bugs for most of a release ;) josh