From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756073Ab1HVI1Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:27:25 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:60372 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755573Ab1HVI1T (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:27:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:27:00 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Linus Walleij Cc: Grant Likely , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lee Jones , H Hartley Sweeten Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] GPIO exodus and cleanup Message-ID: <20110822082700.GK12028@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1312978564-18069-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20110817090123.GD1006@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 09:53:48AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> Ping on this, on monday I'll pretend it's no big deal and pour them > >> into Russells patch tracker anyway, since he's managing more than > >> half of the kernels GPIO code in arch/arm/* anyway. > > > > If Russell is okay with it, then go ahead and merge it.  I'm being > > pretty liberal about GPIO driver moves.  I'm fine with them getting > > cleaned up after the drivers/gpio move. > > Okay! Russell I've put them into your patch tracker as patches > 7032/1 thru 7050/1 so you can pick and choose. I've rebased on > top of what's in -next hoping that the stuff there affecting these > file will mainly be identical to what's on your "gpio" branch. > > Tell me if I should rebase on something specific or if there are > any problems. I've applied as many as I can, but 7042/1, 7046/1, 7047/1 and 7048/1 failed: Patching 7042/1... git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.26923 2>&1 exited with non-zero status: 256 error: patch failed: drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c:24 error: drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c: patch does not apply Patching 7046/1... git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.26923 2>&1 exited with non-zero status: 256 error: patch failed: arch/arm/mach-mmp/gplugd.c:9 error: arch/arm/mach-mmp/gplugd.c: patch does not apply error: drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c: does not exist in index Patching 7047/1... git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.26923 2>&1 exited with non-zero status: 256 error: patch failed: drivers/gpio/Makefile:40 error: drivers/gpio/Makefile: patch does not apply Patching 7048/1... git apply --whitespace=fix -p1 --index --check > /tmp/pdb.26923 2>&1 exited with non-zero status: 256 error: drivers/gpio/gpio-pnx4008.c: does not exist in index It looks like there are changes to these in other trees which conflict.