From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755170Ab1HXGLA (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 02:11:00 -0400
Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:46809 "EHLO
	mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751057Ab1HXGK5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 02:10:57 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:10:51 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: JJ Ding <jj_ding@emc.com.tw>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
        Aaron Huang <aaron_huang@emc.com.tw>, Tom Lin <tom_lin@emc.com.tw>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9ric?= Piel <E.A.B.Piel@tudelft.nl>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org>,
        Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@canonical.com>,
        Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>,
        Alessandro Rubini <rubini@cvml.unipv.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Input: elantech: add support for newer hardware
Message-ID: <20110824061051.GA15604@core.coreip.homeip.net>
References: <1314164303-30382-1-git-send-email-jj_ding@emc.com.tw>
 <87wre31hnu.fsf@emc.com.tw>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87wre31hnu.fsf@emc.com.tw>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi JJ,

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 01:51:17PM +0800, JJ Ding wrote:
> Sorry.
> linux-kernel and linux-input complains patch #2's subject
> ETP_2FT_XXXX looks like spam.
> (5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.7.1 Content-Policy reject msg: The
> capital Triple-X in subject is way too often associated with junk email,
> please rephrase.  BF:<H 0>; S1752956Ab1HXFgV'
> )
> so patch #2 is blocked.
> Please ignore this series.
> I will rephase and resend.

Just resend that one patch changing subject to ETP_2FT_* or similar...
No need to resend the rest of the patches.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry