From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755284Ab1H2WGH (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:06:07 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:44039 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754537Ab1H2WGB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:06:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:03:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20110829.180348.1774953636752413432.davem@davemloft.net> To: bharrosh@panasas.com Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, joe@perches.com, bfields@fieldses.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/24] sunrpc: Remove unnecessary OOM logging messages From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4E5C0AB3.90401@panasas.com> References: <2E1EB2CF9ED1CB4AA966F0EB76EAB4430AEB4EE9@SACMVEXC2-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <20110829.143751.1153162956919885670.davem@davemloft.net> <4E5C0AB3.90401@panasas.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Boaz Harrosh Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:54:59 -0700 > I have a question about that. Are the dprints going to show the stack backtrace? Yes, OOMs give full stack backtraces. > If yes above? then I'm not sure I like it either, because am I'll be getting a full > stack backtrace for every failed allocation? They've been doing this for years, so obviously they haven't bothered you enough to care up to this point. All of this pushback is pure uneducated noise, please stop blocking progress with poorly informed objections.