From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756642Ab1IHXxv (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:53:51 -0400 Received: from d1.icnet.pl ([212.160.220.21]:37128 "EHLO d1.icnet.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756475Ab1IHXxq (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:53:46 -0400 From: Janusz Krzysztofik Organization: Tele-Info-System, Poznan, PL To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.1-rc1] ARM: entry: fix wrong parameter used in do_thumb_abort Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 20:02:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.3; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <201108241307.21056.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> <20110907114740.GS6619@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <201109071958.47945.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> In-Reply-To: <201109071958.47945.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201109082002.11635.jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on d1.icnet); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 at 19:58:47 Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 at 13:47:40 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:10:08PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > > > Any special requirements as to the process of submitting bug > > > fixes against arch/arm common bits? > > > > It needs to go into the patch system for merging so that it doesn't > > get buried and forgotten - as already demonstrated. > > Still not sure: am I suppposed to do something for the patch to go to > the patch system? Or do you take care of this? OK, instead of waiting for your answer, I've found an interface to your patch system myself and submitted the patch. Next time, for how long after posting a patch to the linux-arm-kernel lists should I wait for comments before I can submit it to the patch system even if there are no signs of the patch being reviewed? IOW, can I assume you accept a patch if you don't comment it for a certain period of time? Thanks, Janusz