From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754765Ab1IMPB0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:01:26 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:51436 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754346Ab1IMPBZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:01:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:01:19 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , Paul Menage , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Aditya Kali , Oleg Nesterov , Kay Sievers , Tim Hockin , Tejun Heo , Containers Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11 v5] cgroups: Task counter subsystem Message-ID: <20110913150115.GB23424@somewhere> References: <1315869091-18933-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1315924371.5977.16.camel@twins> <20110913143749.GA23424@somewhere> <1315925360.5977.17.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1315925360.5977.17.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:49:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 16:37 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Because cgroup_task_limit.c sounds way too much generic to be > > self-explanatory. > > Uhm, why? That's exactly what it does, no? It limits the number of > tasks. To me that name sounds too generic. It's like something that does a random limit on the tasks. Could be memory, IO or whatever. But not something on the number of tasks. Or may be cgroup_tasks_limit.c (note the "s" that tells about tasks as a set), or cgroup_max_tasks.c ?