From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932262Ab1IMSjq (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:39:46 -0400 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:55309 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932101Ab1IMSjp (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:39:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:39:41 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Haiyang Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/20] Staging: hv: storvsc: Get rid of storvsc_dev_add() by inlining the code Message-ID: <20110913183941.GA23318@infradead.org> References: <1315936759-20623-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1315936796-20662-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1315936796-20662-9-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1315936796-20662-9-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:59:45AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote: > Get rid of storvsc_dev_add() by inlining the code. This also means struct storvsc_device_info can go away, doesn't it?