From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751533Ab1INXjG (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:39:06 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:58384 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751488Ab1INXjF (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:39:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:38:39 +0100 From: Russell King To: Mark Brown Cc: Axel Lin , Harald Welte , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood , Lars-Peter Clausen Subject: Re: [linux-next] ASoC: sound/soc/samsung/neo1973_wm8753.c build failure Message-ID: <20110914233838.GB22946@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1315991893.17271.2.camel@phoenix> <20110914191917.GA30518@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110914232808.GC2953@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110914232808.GC2953@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:28:09AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 08:19:17PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > Therefore, I suggest that the GTA01 will never be submitted now, moreover > > I'm not entirely sure about that, while... > > > I suggest that neo1973_gta01 was probably a prototype and neo1973_gta02 > > was probably the production platform. > > ...this is true a substantial proportion of the GTA01 devices out there > are in the hands of people who might hack on it. Point at a mainline kernel which includes support for the neo1973_gta01 platform. I assert that there have been none - had there been it would not have been removed from mach-types, as it would've been marked as existing in mainline. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: