From: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
agk@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: request baset device mapper in Linux
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:08:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110916140839.GE7428@ics.muni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMM=eLd9fToJ5Kh+vf4WG1ZN-qTc2CX98-+BUkFWWQQ=tCG7LQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:49:52PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Does "with your patch" mean against 3.0.3 or the original 2.6.32 kernel?
>
> If you apply the patch to the 3.0.3 kernel do you regain the performance?
Unfortunately, the patch does not help with 3.0.3 kernel
top looks like this:
63 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 38 0.0 0:16.65 kswapd1
18 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 32 0.0 0:14.38 kworker/4:0
19 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 30 0.0 0:20.88 ksoftirqd/4
153 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 29 0.0 0:14.46 kworker/4:2
62 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 22 0.0 0:09.44 kswapd0
16726 root 20 0 9484 1628 588 D 11 0.0 0:03.94 dd
16721 root 20 0 9484 1628 588 D 11 0.0 0:03.87 dd
16723 root 20 0 9484 1624 588 D 11 0.0 0:04.02 dd
16725 root 20 0 9484 1628 588 D 11 0.0 0:03.89 dd
16727 root 20 0 9484 1628 588 D 11 0.0 0:03.91 dd
16728 root 20 0 9484 1624 588 D 11 0.0 0:03.89 dd
16729 root 20 0 9484 1624 588 D 11 0.0 0:03.89 dd
16724 root 20 0 9484 1624 588 D 11 0.0 0:03.93 dd
16674 root 20 0 9484 1624 588 R 6 0.0 0:01.99 dd
16685 root 20 0 9484 1624 588 D 6 0.0 0:02.00 dd
16654 root 20 0 9484 1628 588 D 5 0.0 0:01.55 dd
16662 root 20 0 9484 1588 588 D 5 0.0 0:01.53 dd
16665 root 20 0 9484 1628 588 D 5 0.0 0:01.57 dd
with patched 2.6.32, it looks like:
17330 root 20 0 9432 1752 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17335 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.35 dd
17316 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17318 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17322 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17323 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.33 dd
17324 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17325 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17326 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.33 dd
17327 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17328 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17329 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17333 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17336 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.35 dd
17344 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.32 dd
17317 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.33 dd
17319 root 20 0 9432 1752 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17320 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.33 dd
17321 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.33 dd
17331 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 R 4 0.0 0:00.33 dd
17332 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
17334 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:00.34 dd
unpatched 2.6.32 looks like:
4 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 100 0.0 0:25.60 ksoftirqd/0
19325 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 48 0.0 0:12.51 dd
19294 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 11 0.0 0:01.09 dd
19323 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 4 0.0 0:01.02 dd
19295 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:02.73 dd
19305 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.53 dd
19327 root 20 0 9432 1760 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.65 dd
19328 root 20 0 9432 1752 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.60 dd
19336 root 20 0 9432 1752 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.49 dd
19350 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.55 dd
19366 root 20 0 9432 1752 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.50 dd
19292 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.65 dd
19300 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.51 dd
19303 root 20 0 9432 1752 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.59 dd
19307 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.71 dd
19318 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 R 2 0.0 0:00.46 dd
19321 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.47 dd
19332 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.49 dd
19334 root 20 0 9432 1760 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.49 dd
19339 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.47 dd
19348 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.48 dd
19355 root 20 0 9432 1756 616 D 2 0.0 0:00.47 dd
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-16 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-20 8:26 Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-21 11:11 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-07-21 13:26 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-22 6:56 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-07-22 8:19 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-07-23 7:28 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-07-24 22:16 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-08-01 9:31 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2011-09-08 13:27 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-09-15 18:49 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-09-16 14:08 ` Lukas Hejtmanek [this message]
2011-09-19 5:50 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-09-29 20:57 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-10-05 8:13 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2011-10-05 10:35 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2011-10-06 5:11 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110916140839.GE7428@ics.muni.cz \
--to=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®