mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Ripduman Sohan <Ripduman.Sohan@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Restore cpus_allowed mask for sleeping workqueue rescue threads
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:29:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110917002946.GU29319@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110915161430.GE1548@tusker>

Hello, Ripduman.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:14:30PM +0100, Ripduman Sohan wrote:
> The rescuer being left bound to the last CPU it was active on is not a
> problem.  As I pointed out in the commit log the issue is that the
> allowed_cpus mask is not restored when rescuers return to sleep,
> rendering inconsistent the presented and actual set of CPUs the
> process may potentially run on.
> 
> Perhaps an explanation is in order.  I am working on a system where we
> constantly sample process run-state (including the process
> Cpus_Allowed field in /proc/<pid>/status) to build a forward plan of
> where the process _may_ run in the future.  In situations of high
> memory pressue (common on our setup) where the rescuers ran often the
> plan begun to significantly deviate from the calculated schedule
> because rescuer threads were marked as only runnable on a single CPU
> when in reality they would bounce across CPUs.

But cpus_allowed doesn't mean where the task *may* run in the future.
It indicates on which cpus the task is allowed to run *now* and it's
allowed to change.

> I've currently put in a special-case exception in our code to account
> for the fact that rescuer threads may run on _any_ CPU regardless of
> the current cpus_allowed mask but I thought it would be useful to
> correct it.  I'm happy to continue with my current approach if you
> deem the patch irrelevant.

I'm not necessarily against the patch if it helps a valid use case but
let's do that when and if the use case becomes relevant enough, which
I don't think it is yet.  Please feel free to raise the issue again
when the situation changes.

Thank you.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-17  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01 13:36 Ripduman Sohan
2011-09-02  0:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-15 16:14   ` Ripduman Sohan
2011-09-17  0:29     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-09-18  6:36     ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2011-09-24  3:07       ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-25  6:02         ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2011-09-30  8:09           ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-30  8:54             ` Ripduman Sohan
2011-09-30  8:57               ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-30  8:59                 ` Ripduman Sohan
2011-10-01  1:10                   ` Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-31 13:17 Ripduman Sohan
2011-08-31 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110917002946.GU29319@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Ripduman.Sohan@cl.cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®