From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753742Ab1IVWzc (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:55:32 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:60569 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751560Ab1IVWz3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:55:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:54:17 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Colin Cross Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , Alexey Dobriyan Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fs: seq_file: add seq_reserve Message-ID: <20110922235417.6cf88f7d@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1316725029-22737-2-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> References: <1316725029-22737-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> <1316725029-22737-2-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:57:07 -0700 Colin Cross wrote: > Adds a seq_reserve function to allow users of the seq_file interface to > increase the initial size of the buffer. Avoids repeated allocations and > calls to the show function in cases where large buffers of known size are > needed. Would it not be better to have something akin to void seq_set_buffer(struct seq_file *m, void *ptr, size_t size) { m->buf = ptr; m->size = size; m->private = 1; } and let the caller simply provide a buffer by any means it wishes (even statically) and free it again itself. That keeps the caller fully in control when it wishes to be. Alan