From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751799Ab1IZRXc (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:23:32 -0400 Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]:63038 "EHLO acsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751474Ab1IZRXb (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:23:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:23:07 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Dan Magenheimer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, David Vrabel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: Fix selfballooning and ensure it doesn't go too far Message-ID: <20110926172307.GA9973@phenom.oracle.com> References: <9827a70d-dfb2-4bbc-9df6-207b10c835ac@default> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9827a70d-dfb2-4bbc-9df6-207b10c835ac@default> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4E80B50F.006E,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 01:58:08PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > [PATCH] xen: Fix selfballooning and ensure it doesn't go too far > > The balloon driver's "current_pages" is very different from > totalram_pages. Self-ballooning needs to be driven by > the latter. Also, Committed_AS doesn't account for pages > used by the kernel so enforce a floor for when there > are little or no user-space threads using memory. Hey Dan, .. > + floor_pages = totalreserve_pages + > + (roundup_pow_of_two(max_pfn) >> 5); Would it make sense to make the shift be a runtime argument in case some users report problems with that calculation? > + /* don't balloon too far, lest OOMs occur... */ > + if (tgt_pages < floor_pages) > + tgt_pages = floor_pages; > + balloon_set_new_target(tgt_pages + > + balloon_stats.current_pages - totalram_pages); > reset_timer = true; > } > #ifdef CONFIG_FRONTSWAP Otherwise it looks OK to me. Would you like me to queue it up for 3.1-rc7?