From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755911Ab1I2Cci (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:32:38 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:57338 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755588Ab1I2Cc1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:32:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:28:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20110928.222854.2075305752860630081.davem@davemloft.net> To: jeremy@goop.org Cc: jbaron@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, michael@ellerman.id.au, jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com Subject: Re: Jump Label initialization From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4E83D49C.9080809@goop.org> References: <4E83D49C.9080809@goop.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:14:52 -0700 > I'm experimenting at the moment with a patch to allow > jump_label_enable() to be called fairly early, and have that be > respected by jump_label_init(). I'm doing this by replacing > arch_jump_label_poke_text_early() with > arch_jump_label_transform_early(), which shares most of its code with > its non-early variant, except that it expects to run in a pre-SMP > environment. > > Does this seem plausible? (I haven't tested it yet.) I have no objections to this.