From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754710Ab1I1O6E (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:58:04 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64393 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754415Ab1I1O6C (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:58:02 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Mark Salter Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/24] C6X: build infrastructure Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:57:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.35-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <1317155405-26235-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> <201109281523.15680.arnd@arndb.de> <1317220372.2580.68.camel@deneb.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1317220372.2580.68.camel@deneb.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109281657.59636.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:reXIeelkUcc55eUIYTi6VOEMBQFBN7BkxLz9pNiTqRK ol/34qiRaXgcogh70pkdxNzGUx7350vrLkO0xjSr0GYKVzFb6+ LdtmsWcziF8uHw/J+zg/1SzMn5HGAMvQkWtyNPvVZ+rfoQaMwJ LQhY5U4MQodcQKpzERMZTNKVDxEyNGAOYHW7moIbGXHEs3ETvh 9ClclAy/5/YFGi8Bu1qN2xp8+4OjPE3BBDSf48eyxDK1Vw8PLh NVcnBnHYIo17b6i6F8jYpSyLy2uFWJTxXlObwI0U6vXJoXWrCn U5vmUCSZ0EzxV7I4tul4rslpDq0pJKxbJRcTVe//nrVsmIPeYc cbeq0+Mwx6QczvMbIBFY= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Mark Salter wrote: > > Also, how different are these boards and socs still? Since you are > > based on device trees for hardware configuration, do you actually > > need the options at all? > > The BOARD configs can go. The SOC configs will go out when clkdev > stuff gets reworked when generic clock bindings are available. > Ok, sounds good. Arnd