mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] ARM: debug: Move DEBUG_ICEDCC into the DEBUG_LL choice
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:04:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110929180428.GA8125@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E84A962.9030806@codeaurora.org>

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:22:42AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >> One of the problems you'll encounter is that there's places where we
> >> don't have any timer infrastructure (eg, decompressor) and software
> >> timing loops won't work (they'll be too slow for the lower-end CPUs
> >> and too fast for the upper-end CPUs.)
> > Agreed, software timing loops are the only option and it's impossible to get
> > them right everywhere. I think the Kconfig help text should be updated so
> > that the timeout paragraph is removed.
> 
> Yes if you wait a long time the timeout for each character will expire
> and the execution will continue.

Wouldn't it be better to detect the first timeout and then stop trying
to write to the DCC?

But, do we really want fancy auto-detection stuff in DEBUG_LL?  A
timeout might make sense for a DCC console, but not here.

David

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-29 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-21  1:23 [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: debug: Add UART1 config choices Stephen Boyd
2011-09-21  1:23 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] ARM: debug: Move DEBUG_ICEDCC into the DEBUG_LL choice Stephen Boyd
2011-09-21  7:56   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-09-29  2:05   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-09-29  9:21     ` Will Deacon
2011-09-29  9:42       ` Will Deacon
2011-09-29  9:46         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-29 10:39           ` Will Deacon
2011-09-29 10:49             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-29 17:22             ` Stephen Boyd
2011-09-29 17:30               ` Will Deacon
2011-09-29 18:04               ` David Brown [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110929180428.GA8125@huya.qualcomm.com \
    --to=davidb@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome