From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755936Ab1JABKy (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:10:54 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:51668 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753289Ab1JABKr (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:10:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:10:42 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Ripduman Sohan Cc: Gilad Ben-Yossef , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Restore cpus_allowed mask for sleeping workqueue rescue threads Message-ID: <20111001011042.GF2658@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1314884193-20454-1-git-send-email-ripduman.sohan@cl.cam.ac.uk> <20110902002917.GD2752@htj.dyndns.org> <20110915161430.GE1548@tusker> <20110924030718.GA29319@htj.dyndns.org> <20110930080914.GM10425@mtj.dyndns.org> <20110930085421.GA11756@tusker> <20110930085714.GB23868@mtj.dyndns.org> <20110930085939.GB11756@tusker> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110930085939.GB11756@tusker> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:59:39AM +0100, Ripduman Sohan wrote: > Tejun Heo wrote: > > > On which CPU a rescuer is doesn't matter at all. Using cpu_all_mask > > is good enough. > > OK. Am I OK to assume you'll edit the original patch to do this? > (i.e. you're not waiting on me?) I think it would be better if you can respin the patch w/ updated patch description explaning why it's a good idea for cpu isolation. Thanks. -- tejun