From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: [patch v2 1/2] sched: Use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:09:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111003220934.834943260@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: sched-use_resched_ipi_to_kick_off_the_nohz_idle.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4976 bytes --]
Current use of smp call function to kick the nohz idle balance can deadlock
in this scenario.
1. cpu-A did a generic_exec_single() to cpu-B and after queuing its call single
data (csd) to the call single queue, cpu-A took a timer interrupt. Actual IPI
to cpu-B to process the call single queue is not yet sent.
2. As part of the timer interrupt handler, cpu-A decided to kick cpu-B
for the idle load balancing (sets cpu-B's rq->nohz_balance_kick to 1)
and __smp_call_function_single() with nowait will queue the csd to the
cpu-B's queue. But the generic_exec_single() won't send an IPI to cpu-B
as the call single queue was not empty.
3. cpu-A is busy with lot of interrupts
4. Meanwhile cpu-B is entering and exiting idle and noticed that it has
it's rq->nohz_balance_kick set to '1'. So it will go ahead and do the
idle load balancer and clear its rq->nohz_balance_kick.
5. At this point, csd queued as part of the step-2 above is still locked
and waiting to be serviced on cpu-B.
6. cpu-A is still busy with interrupt load and now it got another timer
interrupt and as part of it decided to kick cpu-B for another idle load
balancing (as it finds cpu-B's rq->nohz_balance_kick cleared in step-4
above) and does __smp_call_function_single() with the same csd that is
still locked.
7. And we get a deadlock waiting for the csd_lock() in the
__smp_call_function_single().
Main issue here is that cpu-B can service the idle load balancer kick
request from cpu-A even with out receiving the IPI and this lead to
doing multiple __smp_call_function_single() on the same csd leading to
deadlock.
To kick a cpu, scheduler already has the reschedule vector reserved. Use
that mechanism (kick_process()) instead of using the generic smp call function
mechanism to kick off the nohz idle load balancing and avoid the deadlock.
[ This issue is present from 2.6.35+ kernels, but marking it -stable
only from v3.0+ as the proposed fix depends on the scheduler_ipi()
that is introduced recently. ]
Reported-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.0+
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
kernel/sched_fair.c | 29 +++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1404,6 +1404,18 @@ void wake_up_idle_cpu(int cpu)
smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
}
+static inline bool got_nohz_idle_kick(void)
+{
+ return idle_cpu(smp_processor_id()) && this_rq()->nohz_balance_kick;
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */
+
+static inline bool got_nohz_idle_kick(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */
static u64 sched_avg_period(void)
@@ -2717,7 +2729,7 @@ static void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
void scheduler_ipi(void)
{
- if (llist_empty(&this_rq()->wake_list))
+ if (llist_empty(&this_rq()->wake_list) && !got_nohz_idle_kick())
return;
/*
@@ -2735,6 +2747,12 @@ void scheduler_ipi(void)
*/
irq_enter();
sched_ttwu_pending();
+
+ /*
+ * Check if someone kicked us for doing the nohz idle load balance.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(got_nohz_idle_kick() && !need_resched()))
+ raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
irq_exit();
}
@@ -8280,7 +8298,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
rq_attach_root(rq, &def_root_domain);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
rq->nohz_balance_kick = 0;
- init_sched_softirq_csd(&per_cpu(remote_sched_softirq_cb, i));
#endif
#endif
init_rq_hrtick(rq);
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -4269,22 +4269,6 @@ out_unlock:
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
-
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct call_single_data, remote_sched_softirq_cb);
-
-static void trigger_sched_softirq(void *data)
-{
- raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
-}
-
-static inline void init_sched_softirq_csd(struct call_single_data *csd)
-{
- csd->func = trigger_sched_softirq;
- csd->info = NULL;
- csd->flags = 0;
- csd->priv = 0;
-}
-
/*
* idle load balancing details
* - One of the idle CPUs nominates itself as idle load_balancer, while
@@ -4450,11 +4434,16 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(int cpu)
}
if (!cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick) {
- struct call_single_data *cp;
-
cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick = 1;
- cp = &per_cpu(remote_sched_softirq_cb, cpu);
- __smp_call_function_single(ilb_cpu, cp, 0);
+
+ smp_mb();
+ /*
+ * Use smp_send_reschedule() instead of resched_cpu().
+ * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which
+ * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance
+ * will be run before returning from the IPI.
+ */
+ smp_send_reschedule(ilb_cpu);
}
return;
}
next reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 22:09 Suresh Siddha [this message]
2011-10-03 22:09 ` [patch v2 2/2] sched: Request for idle balance during nohz idle load balance Suresh Siddha
2011-10-04 9:05 ` [patch v2 1/2] sched: Use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-04 18:03 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-10-06 17:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-08 0:09 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-10-10 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-10 14:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 15:25 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111003220934.834943260@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®