From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@gmail.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] kmemleak: Handle percpu memory allocation
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:06:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111004170628.GD13865@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111004165958.GA18371@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 05:59:58PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Catalin.
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 10:26:24AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Before kmemleak is initialised we still get memory allocations that
> > kmemleak stores in an early_log buffer (via the log_early() function
> > called from kmemleak_alloc_percpu). Later when kmemleak has all the data
> > structures in place, the kmemleak_init() function goes through the
> > early_log array and replays the previously recorded requests. The
> > early_alloc_percpu() function is used during early_log replaying and it
> > indeed registers every percpu memory block but the early_log is always
> > O(#PCPU_ALLOCS).
> >
> > The reason we don't call kmemleak_alloc_percpu() directly during
> > replaying is that early_alloc() also copies the previously recorded
> > stack trace into the newly created object (otherwise all early
> > allocations would be shown as done by kmemleak_init).
>
> Ah, okay, I was misreading the patch. For some reason, log_early()
> was nested inside for_each_possible_cpu(), but one other thing.
> kmemleak_free_percpu() is calling log_early() w/ KMEMLEAK_FREE.
> Shouldn't it be KMEMLEAK_FREE_PERCPU?
Good point, I updated the patch.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-04 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 11:02 [PATCH 0/4] Kmemleak patches for -next Catalin Marinas
2011-09-29 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] kmemleak: Show where early_log issues come from Catalin Marinas
2011-09-29 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] kmemleak: Handle percpu memory allocation Catalin Marinas
2011-09-29 11:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-29 17:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-09-29 17:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-29 19:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-30 8:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-10-03 15:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-10-03 16:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-04 7:59 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-04 9:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-10-04 9:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-04 9:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-10-04 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-04 17:06 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2011-09-29 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] kmemleak: When the early log buffer is exceeded, report the actual number Catalin Marinas
2011-09-29 11:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] kmemleak: Report previously found leaks even after an error Catalin Marinas
2011-10-04 17:45 ` Nick Bowler
2011-10-04 20:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-10-04 21:14 ` Nick Bowler
2011-10-24 18:57 ` Nick Bowler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111004170628.GD13865@e102109-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=huajun.li.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®