From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935429Ab1JEVxl (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:53:41 -0400 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:56191 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934884Ab1JEVxk (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:53:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:53:30 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Rusty Russell , Chris Wright , Jens Axboe , Stefan Hajnoczi , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: ->make_request support for virtio-blk Message-ID: <20111005215330.GA13514@infradead.org> References: <20111005195403.407628164@bombadil.infradead.org> <20111005203116.GM30146@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111005203116.GM30146@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:31:16PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > So you no longer believe that request queue overhead can be brought > down to mangeable levels for these fast devices. And instead go for > bio based drivers and give up on merging and implement own FLUSH/FUA > machinery. Not in a reasonable time frame. Having a common interface is still the grand plan, but the virtio performance issues are hurting people so badly that we need a fix soon.