From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965128Ab1JGKHs (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 06:07:48 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:55139 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759641Ab1JGKHr (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2011 06:07:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 11:06:15 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dilan Lee , Mark Brown , Manjunath GKondaiah , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gpiolib: handle deferral probe error Message-ID: <20111007110615.7638e905@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1317963790-29426-5-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com> References: <1317963790-29426-1-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com> <1317963790-29426-5-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 10:33:09 +0500 "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" wrote: > > The gpio library should return -EPROBE_DEFER in gpio_request > if gpio driver is not ready. Why not use the perfectly good existing error codes we have for this ? We have EAGAIN and EUNATCH both of which look sensible.