Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: create a pin control subsystem v9

[Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:23:53AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com> wrote:
> 
> >> + * @hog_on_boot: if this is set to true, the regulator subsystem will itself
> >                                                ^^^^^^^^^
> > s/regulator/pinmux?
> 
> Yep!
> 
> >> +#endif /* !CONFIG_PINCTRL */
> >
> > s/!CONFIG_PINCTRL/CONFIG_PINMUX?
> 
> Yep!
> 
> Foldes into original patch with a fixup comment.
> 
> Can I have your Reviewed-by: tag on this subsystem?
> 
Sorry, not yet.  This is not a full review.  I'm trying to migrate imx
pinctrl to the subsystem.  And all these are just some random spotting.

Another couple of typo on pinctrl.txt?

> diff --git a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2915fea
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,951 @@

[...]

> +The example 8x8 PGA package above will have pin numbers 0 thru 63 assigned to
> +its physical pins. It will name the pins { A1, A2, A3 ... H6, H7, H8 } using
> +pinctrl_register_pins_[sparse|dense]() and a suitable data set as shown

It should just be pinctrl_register_pins()?

> +earlier.

[...]

> +System pinmux hogging
> +=====================
> +
> +A system pinmux map entry, i.e. a pinmux setting that does not have a device
> +associated with it, can be hogged by the core when the pin controller is
> +registered. This means that the core will attempt to call regulator_get() and
> +regulator_enable() on it immediately after the pin control device has been
> +registered.

s/regulator_get/pinmux_get, and s/regulator_enable/pinmux_enable

-- 
Regards,
Shawn