From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753567Ab1JMTNH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:13:07 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:43555 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752352Ab1JMTNG (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:13:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:11:36 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_rdc: parallel scanning needs an extra locking Message-ID: <20111013201136.20594eff@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <201110131808.31470.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <201110131606.04496.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20111013164923.23683fcb@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <201110131808.31470.bzolnier@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:08:31 +0200 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:06:04 +0200 > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > Subject: [PATCH] pata_rdc: parallel scanning needs an extra locking > > > > > > This is similar change as commit 60c3be3 ("ata_piix: parallel scanning > > > on PATA needs an extra locking") for ata_piix host driver. > > > > Again has anyone verified with the vendor that the RDC can support > > parallel scanning ? > > Upstream has always used it: Fair enough as nobody has complained.