From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751945Ab1JOJ0T (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:26:19 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:40226 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751516Ab1JOJ0S (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:26:18 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 10:25:59 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Jiri Slaby Cc: Godmar Back , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: Q.: Why does tty_ioctl.c: set_termios return EINTR instead of ERESTARTSYS? Message-ID: <20111015102559.3e85b32d@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4E994A65.7000509@suse.cz> References: <4E994A65.7000509@suse.cz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Is there a particular reason why it cannot be made restartable? > > EINTR is used when there is no way to rollback already performed > actions. In this case, a flush could be performed. (This holds only for > TCSETSF, TCSETSF2 and similar.) So I think this is the reason we cannot > return ERESTARTSYS. > > However I CCed tty fellows, they may have a different opinion. I don't actually know. I think Linus or Ted T'so were still doing the tty code that long back. Ted also did some compliance testing on it way back when (1995 or so ?)