From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751470Ab1JQLoh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:44:37 -0400
Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:46915 "EHLO
	www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751374Ab1JQLog (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 07:44:36 -0400
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:40:32 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Simon Kirby <sim@hostway.ca>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc9
Message-ID: <20111017124032.65d8973a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1318848001.6594.45.camel@twins>
References: <CA+55aFxPNszU5UHFrDDYnshLEMupaviFwhgEsgmPkqpmuWNZ8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111007070842.GA27555@hostway.ca>
	<20111007174848.GA11011@hostway.ca>
	<1318010515.398.8.camel@twins>
	<20111008005035.GC22843@hostway.ca>
	<1318060551.8395.0.camel@twins>
	<20111012213555.GC24461@hostway.ca>
	<20111013232521.GA5654@hostway.ca>
	<CA+55aFxxfsFMgqA7kYKukvkCX6Z9HrKOtP-22w5Mc21iQj4c=Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111017045806.GA11561@elte.hu>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1110171101250.3240@ionos>
	<1318848001.6594.45.camel@twins>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Face: 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
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:40:01 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 11:03 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > That's not a micro optimization, it's a massive performance hit if you
> > force those 32bit archs to do 64/32 all over the place.
> > 
> Linus could just say he doesn't care about 32bit and everybody sane
> should just get a 64bit machine.. but I suspect that's a few more years.
> 
> Although I hope not too long, even my phone could do with more than 2G
> of memory.

Perhaps it wouldnt; if people didn't keep adding junk to the system ;)