mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ctalbott@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:33:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111019173337.GH25124@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111019172914.GI1140@redhat.com>

Hello,

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 01:29:14PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hmmm... the thing is you need to check DEAD again once after releasing
> > and re-grabbing the queuelock, os if we move the test into the caller,
> > we end up having one in the caller and one in the callee, so I thought
> > it would be better to keep them in the same function.
> 
> Sorry I did not get that why do we need to check again for DEAD after
> realeasing the queue lock. From throttling perspective, we grab lock
> once, if queue is DEAD, release lock and just return.
> 
> blk_throtl_bio() {
> 
>   bunch_of_checks_without_queue_lock;
> 
>   spin_lock()
>   if (queue_dead) {
> 	spin_unlock()
> 	return;
>   }
> 
>   throtl_get_tg();
> }	

Because DEAD state is protected by queue_lock and get_tg may release
and re-grab queue_lock across allocation?  It needs to re-test after
re-grabbing.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-19 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-19  4:26 [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:26   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:29     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 16:59       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 22:05         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 22:07           ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 23:51             ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 13:41               ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 16:11                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 16:16                   ` Kay Sievers
2011-10-20 17:50                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 17:47                   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: move blk_throtl prototypes to block/blk.h Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:33   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:44   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:31     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: drop unnecessary blk_get/put_queue() in scsi_cmd_ioctl() and blk_get_tg() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:52   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:35     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: reorganize queue draining Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: reorganize throtl_get_tg() and blk_throtl_bio() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 14:56   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:06     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:19       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:30         ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:45           ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:49             ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: make get_request[_wait]() fail if queue is dead Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 15:22   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: drop @tsk from attempt_plug_merge() and explain sync rules Tejun Heo
2011-10-19  4:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:43   ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 17:13     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 18:04       ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 16:18   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:12     ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:29       ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:33         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-10-19  4:29 ` [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:44 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111019173337.GH25124@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=ctalbott@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome