From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, vgoyal@redhat.com, jgarzik@pobox.com,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] block: allow blk_execute_rq_nowait() to be called form IRQ context
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:13:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111021181339.GA28670@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111021092016.GA14388@infradead.org>
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 05:20:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:56:36PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Currently blk_execute_rq_nowait() directly calls __blk_run_queue() and
> > thus can't be called from IRQ context. This patch updates it to use
> > blk_run_queue_async() instead. This will be used to unexport
> > elv_add_request().
> >
> > This changes how queue is kicked after blk_execute_rq_nowait() but
> > it's hardly a hot path and the effect shouldn't be noticeable.
>
> It actually very much is a fasthpath for many of it's users, e.g. the
> SCSI tape drivers, the OSD layer and the target scsi passthrough
> backend.
>
> I don't think blindly adding a context switch here without benchmarking
> is doable. Just add variants that do the workqueue dance or not.
Hmm... I'd really like to keep that detail inside block layer. How
about something like the following?
Thanks.
>From b6954535fe7a585a97e2ce3955569981b833e4db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:07:58 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] block: allow blk_execute_rq_nowait() to be called form IRQ context
Currently blk_execute_rq_nowait() directly calls __blk_run_queue() and
thus must be called from sleepable context. This patch updates the
function such that it can be called from non-sleepable context and
schedules async execution in such cases. This will be used to
unexport elv_add_request().
While at it, add FIXME comment for REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME special case.
-v2: hch pointed out that blk_execute_rq_nowait() can be hot path for
some drivers. Retained direct execution from sleepable context.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
---
block/blk-exec.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-exec.c b/block/blk-exec.c
index a1ebceb..b686f2b 100644
--- a/block/blk-exec.c
+++ b/block/blk-exec.c
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
rq_end_io_fn *done)
{
int where = at_head ? ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT : ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK;
+ bool may_sleep = !preempt_count() && !irqs_disabled();
+ unsigned long flags;
if (unlikely(test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, &q->queue_flags))) {
rq->errors = -ENXIO;
@@ -59,14 +61,27 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
rq->rq_disk = bd_disk;
rq->end_io = done;
- WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
- spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
__elv_add_request(q, rq, where);
- __blk_run_queue(q);
- /* the queue is stopped so it won't be run */
- if (rq->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME)
- q->request_fn(q);
- spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Some drivers beat this path pretty hard. As an optimization, if
+ * we're being called from sleepable context, run @q directly.
+ */
+ if (may_sleep) {
+ __blk_run_queue(q);
+ /*
+ * The queue is stopped so it won't be run.
+ * FIXME: Please kill me along with REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME.
+ */
+ if (rq->cmd_type == REQ_TYPE_PM_RESUME)
+ q->request_fn(q);
+ } else {
+ blk_run_queue_async(q);
+ }
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_execute_rq_nowait);
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-21 3:56 [PATCHSET block:for-3.2/core] further updates to blk_cleanup_queue() Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 3:56 ` [PATCH 1/6] block, sx8: kill blk_insert_request() Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 4:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-10-21 3:56 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: allow blk_execute_rq_nowait() to be called form IRQ context Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-21 18:13 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-10-21 3:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] block, ide: unexport elv_add_request() Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 3:56 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: add blk_queue_dead() Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 3:56 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: fix drain_all condition in blk_drain_queue() Tejun Heo
2011-10-21 3:56 ` [PATCH 6/6] block: add missing blk_queue_dead() checks Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111021181339.GA28670@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rni@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome