From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753854Ab1KBXKE (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 19:10:04 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:53840 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752614Ab1KBXKC (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 19:10:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:09:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20111102.190955.1902322759075682192.davem@davemloft.net> To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Cc: tony@atomide.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add back alignment for size for __alloc_skb From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <4EB1CA4F.3090403@gmail.com> References: <20111102224317.GM31337@atomide.com> <4EB1CA4F.3090403@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.2 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (shards.monkeyblade.net [198.137.202.13]); Wed, 02 Nov 2011 16:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:55:11 +0100 > There is a problem with your kmalloc() or alignments on your architecture. > > What is the SMP_CACHE_BYTES value ? kmalloc() behavior doesn't have anything to do with this bug. The issue is calculation of skb->end, which is based upon calculated 'size' variable. skb->end determines alignment of skb_shared_info, which is where the alignment problem is occuring for Tony.