From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756371Ab1KCRI6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:08:58 -0400 Received: from swift.blarg.de ([78.47.110.205]:56867 "EHLO swift.blarg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755135Ab1KCRIz (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:08:55 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 589 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:08:54 EDT Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:59:03 +0100 From: Max Kellermann To: Glauber Costa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH] new cgroup controller "fork" Message-ID: <20111103165903.GA4755@Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal> Mail-Followup-To: Glauber Costa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Frederic Weisbecker References: <20111103162238.27609.11515.stgit@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> <4EB2C4A5.6000406@parallels.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EB2C4A5.6000406@parallels.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2011/11/03 17:43, Glauber Costa wrote: > I do have a couple of questions about this, but the most important > one is: Is this a competing implementation, or a cooperative effort > with Frederic's ? Short answer: competing. Long answer: I do not know Frederic's patch. This is a repost of a patch that I submitted 9 months ago: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/17/116 After little discussion, nobody seemed to be interested in it, and nobody merged it. I reposted it today, not knowing somebody else had come up with a similar idea meanwhile. Max