On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:28:06PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Doesn't this still fix one issue here, just not both of them described,
> right?

Not really.

We've got a list from 0 - 100.  We should be checking them all.
If number 50 is unaligned in the old version we would check 0 - 50,
but with this patch applied we check from 0 to 51.

regards,
dan carpenter