From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756423Ab1KHXgi (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:36:38 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45639 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751099Ab1KHXgh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:36:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 15:36:35 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "namhyung@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , David Vrabel , "rientjes@google.com" , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Revert] Re: [PATCH] mm: sync vmalloc address space page tables in alloc_vm_area() Message-Id: <20111108153635.45b3c517.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20111108233132.GA1230@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1314877863-21977-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <20110901161134.GA8979@dumpdata.com> <4E5FED1A.1000300@goop.org> <20110901141754.76cef93b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4E60C067.4010600@citrix.com> <20110902153204.59a928c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110906163553.GA28971@dumpdata.com> <20111105133846.GA4415@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20111107203613.GA6546@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20111108150153.e3229374.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20111108233132.GA1230@phenom.dumpdata.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:31:32 -0500 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > And Linus picked it up. > > > > I've no idea what's going on here. > > Heh. Sorry for being so confusing. Merge windows are a bit stressful and > I sometimes end up writing run-on sentences. > > > > > .. snip.. > > > > > > > > Also, not sure what you thought of this patch below? > > > > > > Patch included as attachment for easier review.. > > > > The patch "xen: map foreign pages for shared rings by updating the PTEs > > directly" (whcih looks harnless enough) is not present in 3.2-rc1 or linux-next. > > . That is b/c it does not have your Ack. The patch applies cleanly to > 3.2-rc1 (as all the other patches that it depends on are now in 3.2-rc1). > > I am humbly asking for you to: > a) review the patch (which you did) and get an idea whether you are OK (sounds like you are) Yup. > b) pick it up in your -mm tree. No added benefit there. > or alternately: > b) give an Ack on the patch so I can put it in my linux-next and push it > for 3.2-rc1. That's OK by me.