From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756251Ab1KIIwh (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2011 03:52:37 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:53522 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750999Ab1KIIwg (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2011 03:52:36 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,483,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="34797404" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:52:34 +0200 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Felipe Balbi Cc: "ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" , Greg KH , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 01/19] usb: otg: Rename otg_transceiver to usb_phy Message-ID: <20111109085234.GC2531@xps8300> References: <1319805325-24689-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <1319805325-24689-2-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <20111108120635.GA2531@xps8300> <20111108150441.GI20728@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111108150441.GI20728@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:04:43PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:28:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but sounds like you are still marrying > > > OTG with transceivers. > > I'm against the idea of usb_phy married with the transceiver (i.e > > transceiver = twl6030 for instance) > > I think the source of confusion is the split phy functionality on OMAPs. > twl6030 basically provides VBUS/ID comparators which communicate VBUS/ID > levels to internal PHY via a well-defined mailbox. We need a > good way to write that down in source code. OK, I think I understand now. So this issue is not in the scope of these patches, right? Br, -- heikki